?

Log in

Not a 'tree-hugger', I swear, I'm just nature enthused... [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
The People Who Hug Trees

[ website | tree_huggers website! ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

(no subject) [Apr. 19th, 2009|11:35 pm]
The People Who Hug Trees

theoutdoortype
[Current Mood |accomplishedaccomplished]
[Current Music |Just Look At Me - Jonathan Richman]

Land of the Valley of Singing Gold, that was it, once upon a time. ~ The Lord of the Rings

Nothofagus Gunnii, also known as the Tanglefoot Beech, or most commonly as "Fagus", to Tasmanians, is a small (usually 1-2m) deciduous tree endemic to Tasmania, and the only native deciduous tree in Australia.


the autumn colours of the fagus are a pilgrimage for Tasmanian walkersCollapse )
X-posted to my personal journal, and a couple of other communities
LinkLeave a comment

[Pimping] Peat Moors Visitor Centre to be axed [Feb. 24th, 2009|02:00 am]
The People Who Hug Trees

7rin
[Current Mood |blahblah]


On the 4th of Feb 2009 the Executive Committee of Somerset County Council resolved to close the Peat Moors Centre at the end of October 2009. The decision is due to be ratified by the full council on 18th February.

The Peat Moors Centre is a renowned 'hands-on' archaeology centre. An area like Glastonbury which is renowned for its prehistoric spiritual connections needs to keep its only attraction that showcases who their ancient inhabitants really were.
While I've never been there, it doesn't look like the kinda place that should be getting closed down any time soon.

Link to the megalithic.co.uk page; scroll down to the bottom of the page to read the comments.

Xposted
LinkLeave a comment

The Land Of Smoke [Mar. 31st, 2008|09:50 pm]
The People Who Hug Trees

theoutdoortype
[Current Mood |sadsad]
[Current Music |Sonny's Burning - The Birthday Party]

As I write this, everything around me is blanketed by a pall of smoke. Three hours drive west of my home, the Tarkine wilderness is burning.

Tasmanian politics being what they are, official communications are still calling it the “Savage River fire”, which in its strictest sense is true: The fire is burning in the area of the Savage River. Everyone in Tasmania, though, knows that area as the Tarkine.

The Tarkine is a wilderness that dare not speak its name in Tasmania. A name that is so deeply rooted in the heated environmental politics of this state, that our forestry-dependent government simply cannot bring itself to utter it.

The name “Tarkine” was coined by environmentalists in the 1980s, named after the aboriginal people of the area. It is a renowned area of wilderness encompassing a great deal of the north-west quadrant of Tasmania, home to extensive tracts of rare temperate rainforest as well as stands of the famous, and heavily protected, Huon pine.

The campaign to protect the Tarkine began in the 1960s, and intensified over the ensuing decades, arguably peaking in 1995 when the state government constructed the infamous “road to nowhere”. Construction of the road was supposed to open the area to tourism, but environmentalists claimed a more sinister agenda; to lay the infrastructure for forestry and mining. It was also argued that building the road would subject the Tarkine to an unacceptably greater risk of bushfire, from vehicle emissions and increased human activity.

Environmentalists’ dire predictions have, alas, been borne out.

The Tarkine fire was started by an SUV driver who had crashed his vehicle and was unable to decide in which direction the road led out. In what would seem to be an appalling act of environmental vandalism, he then deliberately lit a bushfire to attract attention.

The entire state was at the time under a total fire ban.

Days later, the fire has mostly been contained, but it is as yet unknown how much damage has been done to the Tarkine.

Official reports have been relatively upbeat, but environmental groups haven’t yet made their own assessment. Roads are still closed to the public.

It is known that the fire burnt out huge areas of buttongrass plain, which should recover quickly. If, however, the fire has destroyed large areas of rainforest or Huon pine, the damage could take decades, if not centuries, to be repaired.

The role of fire in environmental management is a contentious issue in Australia. As someone who cares deeply about the Australian environment, and also as a volunteer firefighter, I have mixed feelings about fire. I do not believe that fire, and so-called “fuel reduction burns” are a blanket solution, but I also do not believe that we should bend all our efforts to preventing fire at all costs.

It is a difficult concept to embrace, but it is indisputable that much of Australia’s environment is truly a man-made artifact. From very soon after their arrival on this continent, humans set in train a pattern of burning that altered the very ecology of the land. Vast areas of rainforest gave way to much drier, open forests and plains. Many plants became deeply dependent on fire as part of their life cycle.

Captain Cook in 1770 made repeated references to sighting smoke and fires during his 1770 exploration of Australia’s east coast,

The arrival of Europeans in 1788 began another seismic shift in the role of fire in the Australian environment. The millennia-old aboriginal practices of “fire stick farming” quickly vanished, and the ecology altered accordingly.

Areas that Cook had described as looking like an English park - great grasslands dotted sparsely with trees - became densely forested, and the pattern of frequent, small and relatively cool fires altered to one of occasional, massive and destructively hot fires.

“Fuel reduction burning” is now the favourite topic of tub-thumping media commentators, with mendacious “greenies” blamed for allowing “the bush” to overgrow, causing the massive fires of the past decade.

The truth, as always, is much more complex. In some environments, fuel reduction burning is appropriate; in others, it is not. Some environments rely on fire. As Country Fire Authority (CFA) captain Billy Bubb, a veteran of the notorious Ash Wednesday fires and a near-legend among CFA volunteers, once said to me: “The bush loves a burn”.

He was, however, talking of the forests around his home in the Otway Ranges of south-eastern Australia. In this case, he was entirely correct. But in other environments, even ones adjoining the Otways, the use of fire is not always an appropriate tool of land management.

Even in areas where it is appropriate, managing fire is still a difficult and challenging task – one that is not made easy by the encroachment of suburbia into bushland.

As Jared Diamond has noted in his book “Collapse”, the efforts of the US Forestry Service are frequently hampered by often city-based property owners distressed at seeing forest fires burning around their weekend country retreats. Lawsuits over any property damage are quick to follow.

But managing even a “controlled burn” is not an easy task, something I know from personal experience. Having participated in even relatively small-scale burns around my home town, I have seen not only the numerous delays as Incident Controllers anxiously wait for exactly the right weather conditions, but also just how easily fires can escape control efforts even under optimal conditions.

Fire is undoubtably an essential land management tool in many parts of Australia. Establishing just which Australian environments are suitable for “firestick farming”, and just how to go about it, is one of the many environmental challenges that Australia faces, with increasing urgency, in the coming decades.

To quote a National Parks officer overseeing the introduction of fire management in Queensland: “Even with satellite surveillance and modern fire-fighting technology, we’re only just beginning to approach the expertise the Aborigines had with just bare feet and firesticks”.

X-posted to my journal and a couple of communities
LinkLeave a comment

(no subject) [Oct. 23rd, 2007|02:12 pm]
The People Who Hug Trees
ecomaiden
Right everyone,

Let's tell the fools at the EU that maybe speed limits and reduced road transport (among other things) are the answer to global warming, NOT biofuels.




Please ask EU Ministers to oppose a new Directive which will further boost the demand for agrofuels
LinkLeave a comment

(no subject) [Oct. 18th, 2007|01:02 pm]
The People Who Hug Trees
ecomaiden
On Tuesday, 23rd October, MPs in the Standing Committee will be debating the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO) Order and there is likely to be a vote in the House of Commons shortly afterwards. The RTFO will make blending of biofuels mandatory in the UK from April 2008. All car drivers will be forced to buy biofuels, including those linked to rainforest destruction, human rights abuses, displacement of rural communities and very high greenhouse gas emissions.

UK peeps only, I'm afraid: What you can doCollapse )
LinkLeave a comment

(no subject) [Oct. 16th, 2007|02:55 pm]
The People Who Hug Trees
ecomaiden
Hey everyone,

The idea behind this email action is to make sure that carbon rainforest protection payments actually do what they are supposed to do: protect rainforests, not destroy them!

Action Alert: Protest Failed World Bank Congo Rainforest Policy and Proposed Ill-Conceived Forest Carbon Payments
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

The Tasmanian Pulp Mill: A view from Tasmania [Oct. 3rd, 2007|11:25 am]
The People Who Hug Trees

theoutdoortype
[Current Mood |angryangry]
[Current Music |Goin' Back - The Byrds]

With regard to the previous post, I think it is important to note that a General Election is imminent in Australia, and the Pulp Mill is shaping up to be a major issue.

A poll released today shows that 27% of voters in the electorates affected by the Pulp Mill would be prepared to switch their vote to the Howard Government if the Environment Minister were to reject the Pulp Mill application. Only 6% would vote against them.

Given that the Howard Government is currently facing a landslide defeat, and that the Tasmanian electorates are marginal electorates, it's should be that the Government can be easily influenced to reject the Mill, if it wants to save its electoral bacon.
LinkLeave a comment

(no subject) [Oct. 1st, 2007|06:01 pm]
The People Who Hug Trees
ecomaiden
FORESTS/CLIMATE ALERT UPDATE: Final Push Needed as Australia's Final Decision on Horrendous Tasmanian Pulp Mill Expected Soon‏

TAKE ACTION
Please register your opposition to the proposed Tasmanian pulp mill as it is widely reported that a final decision is imminent
LinkLeave a comment

(no subject) [Sep. 24th, 2007|03:43 pm]
The People Who Hug Trees
ecomaiden
Action on agrofuels

Recently, politicians in Europe have jumped on the idea that making fuel from plants could be a solution to climate change. But Europe’s increased demand for these agrofuels (also called biofuels) is likely to have devastating impacts on the developing countries which produce them.

Rainforests will be destroyed to make way for palm oil plantations and the poor will suffer as global food prices rise. Even in Europe, food is already getting more expensive and farming will need to become more intensive as agricultural land is taken up growing agrofuels.

The European Union’s policies are even accelerating these trends. An EU decision that 10% of all transport fuels must be produced from agrofuels by the year 2020 is driving investment into the agrofuels sector.

Click here to write to your MEP and tell them to put a break on agrofuels!
LinkLeave a comment

(no subject) [Sep. 22nd, 2007|01:17 pm]
The People Who Hug Trees
ecomaiden
Action Alert: Climate Protection Payments Must Avoid Deforestation of Ancient Rainforests AND Their Industrial Diminishment

Ancient rainforests will only fully hold their carbon when strictly protected.
Selective logging diminishes primary and old-growth forests' carbon stores, ecosystems, and biodiversity; and has no place in proposed carbon market payments for rainforest and climate protection.
LinkLeave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]